<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Working Pathways</title>
	<link>http://workingpathways.com</link>
	<description>The Work Better Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Gone Building</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/gone-building/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/gone-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/gone-building/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lighter than usual posting here for the foreseeable future, I&#8217;ve been focused on building feedseeder.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lighter than usual posting here for the foreseeable future, I&#8217;ve been focused on building <a href="http://feedseeder.com">feedseeder</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/gone-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Close to Unsubscribe All</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/this-close-to-unsubscribe-all/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/this-close-to-unsubscribe-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FeedSeeder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/this-close-to-unsubscribe-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;You might wonder why you subscribe to all of this information with no immediate context.&#8221; - Aaron Mentele
The whole reason for the Feedseeder Project is that current feed readers aren&#8217;t cutting it and I don&#8217;t see them set up to change. I&#8217;ve talked about this is a number of posts. In fact, I actually think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://charisma18.com/2007/03/10/bent-stimuli/">&#8220;You might wonder why you subscribe to all of this information with no immediate context.&#8221; - Aaron Mentele</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The whole reason for the Feedseeder Project is that current feed readers aren&#8217;t cutting it and I don&#8217;t see them set up to change. I&#8217;ve talked about this is a number of posts. In fact, I actually think the models behind NetNewsWire, NewsFire, Google Reader, (not to mention much less useful readers like PageFlakes, My Yahoo, and Google Homepage) are stagnant. And, as much as I of a <a href="http://scripting.com">Dave Winer</a> fanboy as I am - the OPML and Userland Radio haven&#8217;t clicked with me either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually thiiiiis close to ignoring the entire current crop of feed readers. Yes, I&#8217;m threatening to uninstall NetNewsWire, just so I can focus on a more appropriate model without being sucked into the current email-based models. As a colleague pointed out this afternoon, it&#8217;s even worse than email - at least in email, it&#8217;s easy to forward items. For me, feed reading, like podcasts are rarely about immediacy - much more about long term. Constantly gather everything I&#8217;m interested in&#8230;.and make it easy to find relevant things over the long term. Something between the <a href="http://www.reallysimplesyndication.com/riverOfNews">River of News</a> and Google models. (It&#8217;s not a far jump to connect this thinking with my interest in hyperlocal journalism).</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.touchstonelive.com/blog/2007/03/imagine-world-without-metadata-now-call.html">&#8220;Adding someone to your feed list is a relatively big decision.&#8221; - Chris Saad</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I disagree with Chris here. Adding someone to my feed list is a very small decision. The actual question I ask is: &#8216;does this writer have the potential to provide me with something interesting?&#8217;</p>
<p>Since most of the new feeds I add are referrers from the people I already read, the answer is almost always: Yes.</p>
<p>Related:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.touchstonelive.com/blog/2007/03/imagine-world-without-metadata-now-call.html">&#8220;Now imagine walking into your local grocery store, and you notice all of the traditional taxonomies have been removed because product classifications are a form of metadata. The aisle signage has been removed.&#8221; - Chris Saad</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Based on my customer research experience - this is how people shop. <a href="http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/if-a-sign-is-needed-something-is-wrong/">Signs</a> are only read when there&#8217;s a problem with the organization of the products. </p>
<p>Update:<br />
Over the weekend, I left NetNewsWire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/this-close-to-unsubscribe-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Hiring</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-future-of-hiring/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-future-of-hiring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Employee Relationship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-future-of-hiring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I want to see evidence of video and audio skills. I want to see evidence of familiarity with CSS, RSS, HTML and every other acronym of new media. I want people who live online, consume content on mobile devices, use social-bookmarking tools and participate in Web communities. I want people who don&#8217;t think they need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://paulconley.blogspot.com/2007/03/future-of-print-and-future-of-hiring.html">&#8220;I want to see evidence of video and audio skills. I want to see evidence of familiarity with CSS, RSS, HTML and every other acronym of new media. I want people who live online, consume content on mobile devices, use social-bookmarking tools and participate in Web communities. I want people who don&#8217;t think they need some gray-haired, middle-aged man like me to give them permission to create &#8212; I want bloggers and page designers and database builders who have made things even when they weren&#8217;t getting paid.&#8221; - Paul Conley</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-future-of-hiring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Costco Connection: The Power of Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/costco-connection-the-power-of-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/costco-connection-the-power-of-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Blogging for Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/costco-connection-the-power-of-podcasts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The March 2007 Costco Connection member magazine has a quick one-page article entitled &#8220;The Power of Podcasts&#8221; for marketing small businesses. 
Definitely. Always glad to see someone with the reach of Costco is promoting podcast as an &#8220;indirect direct marketing&#8221; tool and &#8220;silent sales force&#8221;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The March 2007 Costco Connection member magazine has a quick one-page article entitled &#8220;The Power of Podcasts&#8221; for marketing small businesses. </p>
<p>Definitely. Always glad to see someone with the reach of Costco is promoting podcast as an &#8220;indirect direct marketing&#8221; tool and &#8220;silent sales force&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/costco-connection-the-power-of-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 Things</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/2-things/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/2-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/2-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
First, a reminder - that when you sit down to do something, and focus on it the results are impressive.A little back story - this last week all I did was add things to the To Do index card stack. Rarely, did I have the celebratory crumple-up-and-toss-in-the-recycling-bin. Today, I cranked through a bunch of them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>First, a reminder - that when you sit down to do something, and focus on it the results are impressive.<br />A little back story - this last week all I did was add things to the To Do index card stack. Rarely, did I have the celebratory crumple-up-and-toss-in-the-recycling-bin. Today, I cranked through a bunch of them and even made fairly dramatic headway on a problem that&#8217;s been taunting me for at least a month.</li>
<li>Secondly, there&#8217;s still quite a bit of work to be done in RSS reading/aggregation land. There are too many identical offerings and none of seem attractive enough to migrate my 300+ feeds too. Something&#8217;s missing. I&#8217;m on a hunt to find it. Any thoughts?</li>
</ol>
<p>Later:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://stories.scripting.com/2007/03/08/programmingWithLove.html">&#8220;I think the problem with browser-based RSS software is that the people who write the apps aren&#8217;t news junkies. If they were, they could, with much less effort, create something far more powerful and far more usable.&#8221; - Dave Winer</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/2-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bring Back the Important Bits</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/bring-back-the-important-bits/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/bring-back-the-important-bits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FeedSeeder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/bring-back-the-important-bits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;My entire field of news and information is flattened by my feed reader. Topic, author, credibility, popularity, context, and relevancy are all stripped.&#8221; - Aaron Mentele
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://charisma18.com/2007/02/28/flat-content/">&#8220;My entire field of news and information is flattened by my feed reader. Topic, author, credibility, popularity, context, and relevancy are all stripped.&#8221; - Aaron Mentele</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/bring-back-the-important-bits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsocial Networks</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/unsocial-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/unsocial-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Worst Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/unsocial-networks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Head Lemur digs into Ning&#8217;s terms of service (similar to Flickr&#8217;s and YouTube&#8217;s, et. al) highlighting the problem: in exchange for free services &#8220;members&#8221; grant rights to their stuff to promote the &#8220;network&#8221;. 
&#8220;None of these sites are created for the people. These are, to the last picture, file, and pixel solely created as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Head Lemur digs into Ning&#8217;s terms of service (similar to Flickr&#8217;s and YouTube&#8217;s, et. al) highlighting the problem: in exchange for free services &#8220;members&#8221; grant rights to their stuff to promote the &#8220;network&#8221;. </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://theheadlemur.typepad.com/ravinglunacy/2007/02/ning_the_latest.html">&#8220;None of these sites are created for the people. These are, to the last picture, file, and pixel solely created as businesses to make money for the plantation owners&#8230;.People flock to these things like the little kid in the room shoveling horseshit, and exclaiming, &#8220;There HAS to be a PONY Here!!&#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry boys and girls, No Pony.<br />
It is just another room filled with shit. They place ads around your stuff, and deliver eyeballs to advertisers in the electronic version of valpack coupons and junk mail.&#8221; - The Head Lemur</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a fair trade either - it assumes that my stuff isn&#8217;t valuable in it&#8217;s own right unless it&#8217;s wrapped in AdSense. I wonder what one of these &#8220;social networks&#8221; would look like that places a higher value on their members&#8217; stuff than on monetization.</p>
<p>Initial thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Members pay a non-trivial amount for access</li>
<li>Members can import, remove, and export all of their stuff easily</li>
<li>Members can kill their account easily - say, by not paying</li>
<li>The network considers members&#8217; stuff private and won&#8217;t use it for self-promotion</li>
</ul>
<p>From that list, I&#8217;m thinking <a href="http://basecamphq.com">BaseCamp</a> or <a href="http://joyent.com/connector/collaboration-suite">Joyent Connector</a> are the closest things we&#8217;ve got.</p>
<p>ELSEWHERE:<br />
Mike @ TechDirt says:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20070227/172904.shtml">&#8220;Peer production only works when it creates value for the &#8216;peers&#8217; involved. When you increase value in one place, there will always be somewhere else where that value can be captured monetarily&#8230;.The mistake is thinking that just because peer production doesn&#8217;t involve direct payments that the overall value isn&#8217;t increased and that there isn&#8217;t a way to later capture that value monetarily.&#8221;</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but, AdSense (and advertising in general) is an admission that the value is misunderstood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/unsocial-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ratings, Scores, Context and Sneezing</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/ratings-scores-context-and-sneezing/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/ratings-scores-context-and-sneezing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/ratings-scores-context-and-sneezing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back, I watched Never Been Thawed a 90-minute, independent, very comprehensive, mockumentary. There was a lot going on in the movie. Lots of different story lines and highly-developed character relationships. More so than I&#8217;ve seen in many a documentary (the non-mocking kind). No, NBT isn&#8217;t a Spinal Tap or a Best In Show, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back, I watched <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0452711/">Never Been Thawed</a> a 90-minute, independent, very comprehensive, mockumentary. There was a lot going on in the movie. Lots of different story lines and highly-developed character relationships. More so than I&#8217;ve seen in many a documentary (the non-mocking kind). No, NBT isn&#8217;t a Spinal Tap or a Best In Show, but it is a good effort in that direction by a lesser known cast.</p>
<p>Now bounce all that off your taste and everything else you know about me. Do you think you&#8217;ll like the movie? Do you even have enough information to say?</p>
<p>The problem is single-attribute rating/ranking/tagging systems. They provide only the most basic value - and always with a caveat. Case in point - searching the web for any single keyword rarely provides anything useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://winecast.net/?p=408">Tim&#8217;s rethinking his wine rating system</a> - maybe something more detailed albeit less glance-able.</p>
<p>Over the weekend, I found the &#8216;Origins&#8217; wine label on store shelves - Temparnillo, Malbec, (2 of my favorites) and other varietals from around the world - all under the same label. On the back, 3 scales indicate where a specific varietal falls on the flavor scale. Three-times the information than a single score.</p>
<p>While even 3 scales can&#8217;t replace the wealth of information found in personal recommendations, it&#8217;s more than an arbitrary number or letter. But, what were the biases and preferences of the person that declared where a specific wine fell on each scale?</p>
<p>In nearly each episode of Winecast, Tim discloses his preference for &#8220;fruit-forward&#8221; wines. If Tim and I share the same definition of &#8220;fruit-forward&#8221;, I have some context for determining if a ranking of &#8216;83&#8242; is something I&#8217;ll like or dislike. If I don&#8217;t know if we share the same definition - I pick up that specific wine and see if my tasting matches his. And repeat.</p>
<p>All this metadata is why recommendations from someone you know really well is far more valuable and those from Amazon, Netflix, etc just aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Yes, this is word-of-mouth, and yes, we are all doing this today when we IM a YouTube link. There&#8217;s got to be a better place to sneeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/ratings-scores-context-and-sneezing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Difference Between Yahoo &#038; Google</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-difference-between-yahoo-google/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-difference-between-yahoo-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-difference-between-yahoo-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From my perspective, sorting out the acquisitions of Yahoo and Google is pretty straight-forward.
Yahoo (list of Yahoo acquisitions) has always been about building a directory. &#8216;Tags&#8217; are just another way to create a directory. From that perspective, purchasing HotJobs (directory of jobs), Flickr (directory of photos), Upcoming (directory of events), del.icio.us (directory of web pages), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my perspective, sorting out the acquisitions of Yahoo and Google is pretty straight-forward.</p>
<p>Yahoo (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Yahoo!">list of Yahoo acquisitions</a>) has always been about building a directory. &#8216;Tags&#8217; are just another way to create a directory. From that perspective, purchasing HotJobs (directory of jobs), Flickr (directory of photos), Upcoming (directory of events), del.icio.us (directory of web pages), even WebJay (directory of music) makes total sense. </p>
<p>Google (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Google_acquisitions">list of Google acquisitions</a>) has always been about measuring social gestures. Thinking about the purchase of Urchin &#038; Measure Map (gestues within a site), Dodgeball (gestures within a place), Adscape (gestures within a video game), YouTube (gestures within video) from that perspective also makes total sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/the-difference-between-yahoo-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s YouTube if Not Public Access?</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/whats-youtube-if-not-public-access/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/whats-youtube-if-not-public-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/whats-youtube-if-not-public-access/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend, Dan Gillmor is doing a workshop on how to make public-access TV relevant. His thoughts echo those I wrote about in, &#8220;Add Cable Public Access to the Endangered Species List&#8220;. Namely, it&#8217;s an artifact of a time when publishing was hard and expensive for citizens to do.
My recommendation for cable companies to fulfill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend, <a href="http://www.dangillmor.com/">Dan Gillmor</a> is doing a workshop on <a href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/02/21/beyond-broadcast-future-of-public-access-tv/">how to make public-access TV relevant</a>. His thoughts echo those I wrote about in, &#8220;<a href="http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/add-cable-public-access-to-the-endangered-species-list/">Add Cable Public Access to the Endangered Species List</a>&#8220;. Namely, it&#8217;s an artifact of a time when publishing was hard and expensive for citizens to do.</p>
<p>My recommendation for cable companies to fulfill their community requirement: &#8220;offer bandwidth [to the community]. Lots and lots of it, with BitTorrent thrown in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some choice excerpts from Dan:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://island94.org/node/119">&#8220;In five years, cable systems will be free to abandon public access programming in every way. They won’t have to provide production facilities or channels.&#8221;</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the meantime&#8230;help members of the community learn modern media production techniques.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>ELSEWHERE:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://island94.org/node/119">&#8220;I believe that the important part of Cable Access Television is access. Access to:<br />
media production tools, media distribution systems, training to use them, media literacy education to understand them. And all of this should be within the context of the needs of the local community&#8230;.Cable Access should not become Internet Access, it must become Media Access.&#8221; - Ben Sheldon</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2007/03/01/you-just-dont-get-it-and-social-networking/">&#8220;Youtube is what it is. A very, very popular, traditional media outlet that provides its content on the net. It is video on the demand that is absolutely no different than the video on demand that comcast or any other cable company or telco offers, except that its user uploaded, limited to 10 minutes and the quality is awful&#8221; - Mark Cuban</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/whats-youtube-if-not-public-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pipes v. Seeds</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/pipes-v-seeds/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/pipes-v-seeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FeedSeeder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/pipes-v-seeds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been asked if Yahoo Pipes is like FeedSeeder.
Sorta. Both merge multiple feeds and allow a level of filtering on the results within a browser-based interface. Though, that description includes quite a few other projects as well. So, I thought a Q&#038;A would be a better way to compare and contrast [P]ipes and [F]eedSeeder.
Does it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been asked if Yahoo Pipes is like FeedSeeder.</p>
<p>Sorta. Both merge multiple feeds and allow a level of filtering on the results within a browser-based interface. Though, that description includes quite a few other projects as well. So, I thought a Q&#038;A would be a better way to compare and contrast [P]ipes and [F]eedSeeder.</p>
<p>Does it create really cool diagrams?<br />
P: Yes<br />
F: No</p>
<p>Is it useful to Garrick?<br />
P: No<br />
F: Yes</p>
<p>Is it free?<br />
P: Yes<br />
F: No</p>
<p>Is it live?<br />
P: Yes<br />
F: No</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/pipes-v-seeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luckmaking in Place</title>
		<link>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/luckmaking-in-place/</link>
		<comments>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/luckmaking-in-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrick Van Buren</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/luckmaking-in-place/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Placemaking takes time and sometimes just plain dumb luck. No planner envisioned it all, first laying out the grid of streets and creating a zoning code for Dinkytown, then deciding precisely that an alley was to be converted to become the location of a breakfast counter and a legendary, delicious business.&#8221; - Sam Newberg
A nice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://joe-urban.com/archive/placemaking-is-hard-workand-luck/">&#8220;Placemaking takes time and sometimes just plain dumb luck. No planner envisioned it all, first laying out the grid of streets and creating a zoning code for Dinkytown, then deciding precisely that an alley was to be converted to become the location of a breakfast counter and a legendary, delicious business.&#8221; - Sam Newberg</a></p></blockquote>
<p>A nice reminder that things like MySpace, CraigsList - while not &#8216;designed&#8217; - are more valuable places than some of the more &#8216;planned&#8217; places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingpathways.com/workbetter/archive/luckmaking-in-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
